In many of the readings,
the terms cultural diplomacy, and citizen diplomacy were used near interchangeably. However, some of
the readings provided the nuanced differences between the terms. The
similarities though between the terms are clearly evident and show how the
terms are interrelated and components of one another.
When describing cultural
diplomacy, Memis notes “The importance of defining target audiences,
objectives, outcomes and success measures is central to our evaluation system;
planning, monitoring and evaluation are therefore are inextricably linked.” Moreover,
cultural diplomacy relies on, “Establishing clear, concise and ambitious
organizational objectives not only provides a compass for every action we take,
but it provides a set of targets which enable effective evaluation.” This is
very similar to the necessity of having a coherent, well-defined strategy when
conducting strategic level public diplomacy. The difference between cultural
diplomacy and public diplomacy at this objective level appears to be the scale
that the two terms or efforts are assessed.
While public diplomacy is clearly at the strategic national level,
cultural diplomacy appears to be at a more targeted lower level, and likely
easier to assess than public diplomacy objectives.
No comments:
Post a Comment